John Savage - definizione. Che cos'è John Savage
Diclib.com
Dizionario ChatGPT
Inserisci una parola o una frase in qualsiasi lingua 👆
Lingua:     

Traduzione e analisi delle parole tramite l'intelligenza artificiale ChatGPT

In questa pagina puoi ottenere un'analisi dettagliata di una parola o frase, prodotta utilizzando la migliore tecnologia di intelligenza artificiale fino ad oggi:

  • come viene usata la parola
  • frequenza di utilizzo
  • è usato più spesso nel discorso orale o scritto
  • opzioni di traduzione delle parole
  • esempi di utilizzo (varie frasi con traduzione)
  • etimologia

Cosa (chi) è John Savage - definizione


John Savage (died 1586)         
ENGLISH CONSPIRATOR (16TH CENTURY)
John Savage (died 20 September 1586) was an English Catholic, who was one of the conspirators executed for his involvement in the Babington Plot, a plot in 1586 to assassinate Queen Elizabeth, a Protestant, and put Mary, Queen of Scots, a Catholic, on the English throne. A former soldier, Savage was to have been the man who would personally assassinate Elizabeth.
John Savage (surveyor)         
AMERICAN SURVEYOR (18TH CENTURY)
John Savage was an 18th-century surveyor of colonial Virginia. He surveyed as part of a 1736 expedition to settle a boundary dispute between Lord Fairfax and the English Privy Council concerning the extent of the vast Northern Neck land grant.
John Savage (actor)         
AMERICAN ACTOR
John Savage (born John Smeallie Youngs) is an American actor, best known for his roles in the films The Deer Hunter (1978), The Onion Field (1979), Hair (1979) and Salvador (1986). He is also known for his role as Donald Lydecker in the TV series Dark Angel.
Esempi dal corpus di testo per John Savage
1. John Savage, executive chairman, said campaigners were "rubbing the noses [of Bristolians]" in the horrors of slavery long after an apology could be meaningful.
2. However, speaking for the officers, Humberside Police Federation chairman John Savage said: "All of the officers involved are deeply disappointed by the outcome of this review and strongly dispute the IPCC‘s findings.